The Branagh version of the Ghost Scene was not appealing. The director decided to use too much effects which ruined the whole scene. The ghost reminded me of a "demon" figure, yet he is Hamlet's father, not one to be afraid of. His eyes were a key figure in the creepiness added into the scene. But, I noticed King Hamlet's ghost was dressed in black armor compared to the white armor the ghost war in the original version by Shakespeare. It was a good contrast that seemed to be needed with all the dark lighting and horrifying background the forest seemed to play as. Branagh used visual elements such as flash blacks to which he was poisoned by Hamlet's uncle. I thought that gave a better sense to the viewer to what actually happened since the dialogue was hard to comprehend.
The last version was directed by Almereyda. As a modern scene for the ghost scene, the props and background was a good touch. Also, the fire playing on the television added a good sense of doom or despair. Ethan Hawke (Hamlet) seemed to be afraid of the ghost throughout the whole scene which was good, but I didn't like the ghost because I'm stuck on the fact that King Hamlet's ghost is supposed to be dressed in black/white armor. Although, the modern interpretation of an all-black-suit was a very good replacement. No visual elements were added that were an appeal to me, but the music in the background was a good add.
With what I saw in these different versions, I would make the scene to be on top of a castle in which only the ghost and Hamlet could appear, as in Zeffirelli's version. Also, Hamlet would be in fear until the ghost would tell him that his uncle killed his father which would enrage Hamlet into swearing revenge onto him. The most important thing to do in this certain scene is to have the perfect portrayal of the ghost. I thought Zeffirelli did the best, but Branagh exaggerated too much when it came to special effects and lighting. Which would be one thing that I would not succumb to.
1 comment:
In my opinion, I agree with Anand because the first version was the best interpretation of Hamlet. The music in the background really helped with the mood of the story. I also agree that the second version had too many special effects. Therefore, taking away the true story of Hamlet. There was too many special effects such as the shaking ground and lighting that just wasn't like in the book. After all, I agree with your point of view.
Post a Comment